Omentir

Sales Navigator vs Apollo

Sales Navigator is LinkedIn search. Apollo is a contact graph. Omentir is send-plus-discovery on LinkedIn. Three objects. One common export ritual that still fails.

sales navigator vs apollo illustration for Omentir

Keep Navigator for Boolean craft. Keep Apollo for the graph and sequences they sell. Add Omentir when either export still never became a LinkedIn conversation.

Sales Navigator, Apollo, and Omentir

Sales Navigator

Object
LinkedIn sales search and saved leads
Goes stale when
You stop opening the saved search
Sends LinkedIn for you
No, not as a sequencer
Apollo

Apollo

Object
Commercial contact graph plus the rest of their platform
Goes stale when
People change jobs and the row is not refreshed
Sends LinkedIn for you
Their sequences are their product. Confirm LinkedIn depth on apollo.io

Omentir

Object
Agents, campaigns, inbox on LinkedIn
Goes stale when
You stop reviewing replies. The list keeps refilling if the agent is on
Sends LinkedIn for you
Yes, from the connected profile, with limits

Packaging changes. Confirm current limits and channels on each product site before you buy.

The export ritual is the hidden product

Teams pay for Navigator, export to Apollo or a sheet, enrich, then upload to Instantly. Each hop is a chance to do nothing. Omentir exists to skip hops, not to win a search-UI contest with LinkedIn.

You can keep both and still need send

Ops teams have reasons to keep Apollo as a system of record. Reps have reasons to keep Navigator. Neither fact means the founder has threads. Name which object you are renewing.

Frequently asked questions

For contact data and some search, buyers treat it that way. It is not LinkedIn's identity graph. Confirm both products before you cancel a seat you still use for Boolean.

Only if you did not need the graph or the filter UI. Most teams should not cancel Navigator on day one of Omentir.

Name which renewal actually produces meetings

If neither does, run one Omentir ICP before you add a third data bill.