Social media
Social media marketing
Organic posts versus paid social, what you rent from an algorithm, and why email is still the channel you keep when the feed changes.
A feed is a landlord
Social media marketing is the work of getting attention inside someone else's product: Meta's apps, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, and the rest. Organic reach is whatever the ranking system still shows to people who already followed you. Paid social is the auction for the rest. Both can work. Neither is a list you take with you if the app dies, the account gets restricted, or the ranking system decides your link is unwelcome. Start with the first-party docs: Meta Business and LinkedIn Marketing Solutions.
Plan social like you plan retail shelf space. You can be good at merchandising. You do not own the store. The practical habit is to use social to earn an address, a text opt-in, or a logged-in user, then talk to those people in a channel you operate.
Feed you do not own
Ranking can hide the link tomorrow
then
Address you do own
Email, SMS, or a logged-in user
Organic and ads are different jobs
Organic is publishing on a cadence the team can keep, answering comments, and making work native to the format (a talk on LinkedIn, a demo on YouTube, a short on TikTok). It is slow and public. It is a poor place to dump the same newsletter HTML. Each network has rules about links, clickbait, and misleading buttons. Breaking them is how organic reach falls off a cliff and how ads get rejected.
Ads need a pixel or event you are allowed to use, a creative that states the offer, and a landing page that matches. They also need a budget you will cut when the auction gets expensive. Mixing organic reporting with paid reporting is how teams convince themselves a page 'went viral' when they spent the virality.
Email as the owned counterpart
Email is slower to grow and ruder if you abuse it, but the file is yours subject to consent law. When Instagram hides links, the list still gets the link. When LinkedIn throttles a company page, a permissioned send still lands in a mailbox. That is the honest contrast: LinkedIn (and every other feed) is distribution you rent. A list people asked to join is distribution you operate. Use social to fill the list. Do not assume a follower is a subscriber.
The reverse mistake is treating email as if it were a feed: posting three times a day because the algorithm likes volume. Mailboxes like restraint. Match the channel to the behavior. Social can be frequent and disposable. Email should be rarer and complete.
Measurement without folklore
Count follows only as a funnel into something you control. Count paid on cost per the action you wanted, after attribution windows you understand. UTM the links. If a creator deal cannot produce a tagged URL, you bought vibes. Screenshot vanity is not a close.
Staff social like a public inbox. Someone has to answer. A brand that posts and disappears trains people to message competitors. If you cannot staff comments, post less, or stay in channels that are closer to broadcast (YouTube) and still check the queue.
Common questions
Should every company be on every network?
No. Pick the one or two where your buyers already linger and where you can publish in the native format. A dead TikTok and a dead X account are not a strategy. They are litter.
Is a LinkedIn page enough for B2B?
A page is a brochure. People still decide in threads, groups, and inboxes. Use the page for news, use people at the company for conversation, and use email for anyone who asked for a longer story. Do not confuse page impressions with pipeline.
Related
Prefer markdown? Social media marketing.md